Acer G540 M2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer G540 M2  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer G540 M2
Memory21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '18 at 02:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550
CPU2, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 67
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 154
57% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 476
47% 386 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB; Palit KalmX
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 40.1
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 37.6
33% 36.5 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 37.1
31% 38 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Goodram C50 120GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 171 191 190 189 189 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.6% Average
Read 222
Write 192
Mixed 153
SusWrite 187
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 13.5
53% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 57.2
66% 113 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170GB0-CH9 6x4GB
6 of 12 slots used
24GB DIMM 15h Reserved 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 19.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback