bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DZ77SL-50K
Memory	3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120319
Uptime	20.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '18 at 22:15
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 171 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 413 44% 351 Pts	64-Core 452 28% 452 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15 52,547 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 2030) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 320GB free (System drive) Firmware: JKAOA3NH SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 41 55 61 78 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 70.7 Write 82.7 Mixed 45.2 SusWrite 61.1 48% 64.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 68%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 25GB free Firmware: PB4OC60F SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 17 24 26 35 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 34.5 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 26.7 21% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 45%
WD Elements 1.5TB 5,064 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 220GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 18 19 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 22.5 Mixed 23 SusWrite 18 30% 23 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 113% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 22%
TOSHIBA MK1255GSX H 120GB 59GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 18 19 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.6% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 19.5 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 17.7 27% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 56% 0.67 MB/s

623 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 26GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 8.2 7.1 8.7 9.6 9.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	7.35% Terrible	Read 28.5 Write 23 Mixed 9 SusWrite 8.9 21% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 1.3 63% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.35% Great: 49%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 1GB 176 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	2.11% Terrible	Read 5.7 Write 1.2 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 2.2 3% 2.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.11% Great: 6%
ST375063 9QK2 750GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 373GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 19 20 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.7% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 23 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 18.6 30% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 12%
Seagate Expansion Desk 1TB 564 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 35GB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 42 46 47 45 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 90.5 Write 79.5 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 44.5 89% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 10.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 9.9 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,022x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,566x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	932x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16