PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 3.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140303 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 21 '18 at 07:40 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | VNM-User |
Background CPU | 55% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
|
65.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Nvidia(10DE 097A) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 124 79 27 97 114 MB/s
|
33.5%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
143GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 108 116 116 116 MB/s
|
62.7%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905402-474.A01LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
45.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 108x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 75x |
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 70x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 136x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 39x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 37x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |