HP h9-1210t

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP h9-1210t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '18 at 22:49
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 509
55% 437 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Nvidia(10DE 0999) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.9% Below average
Lighting 37
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 48.3
30% 40.3 fps
MRender 46.6
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 33
32% 40.5 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 134 138 135 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 194
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 132
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
12GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 18 20 6.6 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 22.5
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 16.4
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
81% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 38%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
29GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 12 12 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 21.5
Write 10
Mixed 7
SusWrite 11.3
15% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.1
138% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 19%
WD Elements 1TB
219GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 19 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 20.3
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 19.3
29% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 43%
Generic- SD/MMC 8GB
5GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 11 11 11 11 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Read 11
Write 5.3
Mixed 3.3
SusWrite 10.7
10% 7.57 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 13%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB
1TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 90 87 90 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 87.5
Write 88.3
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 87.9
103% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 53%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 16.8
Write 4
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.4
10% 8.43 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.1
150% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 12%
WD My Passport 071A 750GB
50GB free, PID 071a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 21.5
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 14.8
28% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 18%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
494GB free, PID ab21
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 74 73 72 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 49.5
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 72.7
79% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
5GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.3 8.9 9.8 11 9 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 23.8
Write 5.8
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 9.7
13% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.4
160% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB
3GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 3.9 4.1 3.6 3.2 4.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 11.5
Mixed 13
SusWrite 3.9
14% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.3
157% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
8GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 1.2 2.1 2 2.1 2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
7% Terrible
Read 21
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 2.1
7% 7.72 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h9-1210t Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

System: HP h9-1210t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback