Lenovo 2344BPF

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 2344BPF (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 2344BPF
Memory	6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180605
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '18 at 18:46
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3520M 19,660 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	52% Above average	Memory 74.5 1-Core 79.3 2-Core 123 57% 92.2 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 196 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 5400M 1,652 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 21F4) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.58 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	3.11% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 5.08 Parallax 3.44 3% 4.2 fps	MRender 5.38 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 2.96 3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.11% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 300GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 313 274 299 299 291 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 259 Write 289 Mixed 252 SusWrite 297 62% 274 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 25.6 82% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 31.3 DQ Write 65.1 DQ Mixed 41.3 33% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 134%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 7TB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 179 180 180 184 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Read 144 Write 158 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 179 107% 145 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.9 375% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 94%
WD My Book 1140 3TB 6,710 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 443GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 37.5 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 18.3 41% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 469 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 222GB free, PID 0577 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 36.2 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 17.6 39% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 20%
WD My Passport 0741 2TB 1,643 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 258GB free, PID 0741 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 31 Write 22 Mixed 23 SusWrite 26.6 34% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 12GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.1% Below average	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 10.2 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 8.9 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 91.5 44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 2344BPF

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)