Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 19 '18 at 17:36
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 138
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 408
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 58.8
56% 64.9 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 68.1
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 62 70 71 70 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 373
Write 344
Mixed 111
SusWrite 69.4
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 29.8
99% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 67.6
DQ Mixed 22.3
24% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
174GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 169 172 169 165 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 174
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 169
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 109%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
48GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 65 71 71 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
49% Average
Read 100
Write 95.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 70.3
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
206% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 10.8
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $152
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback