Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '18 at 01:43
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 188
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 400
54% 402 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D9) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Lighting 36
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 30.4
29% 30.6 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 32.2
28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 123 131 134 134 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 303
Write 107
Mixed 152
SusWrite 132
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 15.7
67% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 32.1
DQ Write 33.8
DQ Mixed 30
23% 32 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
398GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 89 89 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 87
Write 84.5
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 87.6
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Ultra USB 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 556c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7.1 6 7.4 6.2 7.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
8.81% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 12.7
Mixed 10
SusWrite 6.8
15% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
59% 2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 12%
Mass Storage Device 1GB
1GB free, PID 125d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Read 8.3
Write 2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.5
5% 4.07 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback