| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP 870-206na (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 82F1 |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1216 x 676 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161219 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 18 '18 at 20:46 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.6%
Excellent
|
78% 136 Pts
|
56% 418 Pts
|
26% 422 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.7%
Very poor
|
16% 20.6 fps
|
20% 24.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 314 318 319 317 320 MB/s
|
122%
Outstanding
|
94% 417 MB/s
|
213% 76.8 MB/s
|
270% 362 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
920GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 165 168 168 170 MB/s
|
99.8%
Outstanding
|
114% 154 MB/s
|
216% 1.6 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Force 32GB
26GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.3 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.7 MB/s
|
7.02%
Terrible
|
15% 12.5 MB/s
|
90% 1.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
42.4%
Average
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
35% 12.4 GB/s
|
58% 69.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 870-206na Builds (Compare 40 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 870-206na
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 38x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 29x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 3x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $214 |