Sgi.com S5520SC

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Sgi.com S5520SC (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel S5520SC
Memory	19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140505
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '18 at 17:26
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5687 1,801 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 84.5 2-Core 151 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 345 38% 298 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT 27,834 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 1575) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	1.99% Terrible	Lighting 2.27 Reflection 4.31 Parallax 0.81 2% 2.46 fps	MRender 3.81 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 2.78 2% 2.78 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.99% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 128 138 125 116 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 236 Write 191 Mixed 179 SusWrite 131 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 57.1 4K Mixed 25.4 94% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 150 113% 151 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 85%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 13GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 81 83 82 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 74.5 Write 73.5 Mixed 53.2 SusWrite 82.1 52% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 62%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 25GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 63 62 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 60 Write 63 Mixed 44.7 SusWrite 62.5 42% 57.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 58%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 5GB free Firmware: 10.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 47 50 44 41 48 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 48.8 Write 47.5 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 47 33% 45.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 12 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	25.7% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 7 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 60.9 66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Sgi.com S5520SC

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)