PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H97M-ITX/ac (all builds) |
Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150512 |
Uptime | 4 Days |
Run Date | Sep 18 '18 at 03:26 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$106
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
66.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 338 177 165 166 166 MB/s
|
79.3%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
98GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 269 265 264 268 297 MB/s
|
92.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Fujitsu MHY2250BH 250GB-$34
73GB free
Firmware: 0000000B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 41 41 MB/s
|
21.6%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
48.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 35x |
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 34x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $54Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 31x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 43x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 21x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $703 |