PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 91.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z820 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158B |
Memory | 2.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161017 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 18 '18 at 00:17 |
Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
|
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
91.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
740GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 87 93 88 91 91 MB/s
|
37.7%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
927GB free
Firmware: A7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 145 145 140 145 142 MB/s
|
71.4%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M391B5773DH0-CK0 8x2GB
8 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
49.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 145x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 113x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 87x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 145x |
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 139x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 65x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |