Asus H87-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	93.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141015
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '18 at 18:23
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	BHR-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 90.2 2-Core 194 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 571 55% 455 Pts	64-Core 548 34% 548 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2632 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.3% Outstanding	Lighting 138 Reflection 147 Parallax 127 112% 137 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 126 Splatting 0.13 57% 79.2 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDTR500GB 500GB 225 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1126A SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 148 107 78 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 450 Mixed 376 SusWrite 158 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 53.2 178% 64.2 MB/s	DQ Read 301 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 114 138% 241 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 103%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 34GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 163 139 141 160 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 109 Write 109 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 153 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 35GB free Firmware: 50.0AB50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 73 73 73 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 71 Write 74 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 72.6 53% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA 750GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 127GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 35.3 Write 7.3 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 19.8 22% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 41%
WD My Passport 0830 1TB 8,379 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 9GB free, PID 0830 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 34.8 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 18.1 35% 27 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.9% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 18.7 58% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 17.5 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87-PLUS Builds (Compare 847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	216x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	145x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	91x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	55x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	42x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	49x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	33x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16