Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E4X-A04CO
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130220
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateSep 15 '18 at 06:03
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B820
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Memory 43.9
1-Core 26.8
2-Core 31.4
24% 34 Pts
4-Core 58.1
8-Core 64.8
8% 61.5 Pts
64-Core 67.3
4% 67.3 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C652) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.36% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.41 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.36%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD HTS545050A7E362 500GB
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2AB990
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 55 58 49 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 32.7
Mixed 20
SusWrite 52.2
26% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 61%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.7
1% 0.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 0.2 4.1 0.6 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 2.8
6% 5.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DM0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 2.7
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback