Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '18 at 02:33
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 96.1
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 156
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 469
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 63
Reflection 73
Parallax 86.7
51% 74.2 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 58.7
53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 464
Write 423
Mixed 306
88% 398 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 38.8
151% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 45
88% 177 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
90GB free
Firmware: 2.25
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 402
Write 148
Mixed 203
55% 251 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 27.5
103% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 29.4
61% 125 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 82%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
721GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 139
Write 140
Mixed 104
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
1TB free
Firmware: 01.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 167
Write 175
Mixed 110
112% 151 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
344% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 107%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89.9
Write 88.4
Mixed 68.1
61% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 20.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 14.5
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 53.6
75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $679
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback