Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '18 at 01:52
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$157
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
SC Int 110
SC Float 118
SC Mixed 113
91% 114 Pts
QC Int 429
QC Float 462
QC Mixed 437
100% 443 Pts
MC Int 898
MC Float 923
MC Mixed 917
137% 912 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$165
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
69.3% Good
Lighting 206
Reflection 180
Parallax 214
65% 200 fps
MRender 152
Gravity 198
Splatting 160
73% 170 fps
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$83
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1316 307 307 307 307 308 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,518
Write 1,477
Mixed 1,061
SusWrite 475
305% 1,383 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 86.6
296% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 879
DQ Mixed 949
706% 936 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 263%
Great: 273%
Toshiba THNSFJ256GMCT 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: JTT11101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 457 460 462 461 462 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 466
Mixed 444
SusWrite 459
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 41.4
137% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 353
261% 343 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$58
261GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 87 87 89 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 84.9
Write 86.5
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 87
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
469GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 62 62 64 63 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 101
Write 96.5
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 63.7
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
881GB free
Firmware: CC94
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 73 74 71 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 70.6
Write 24.8
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 73.3
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$58
931GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 102 105 111 110 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 70
SusWrite 107
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 31
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 27.6
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 131%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $1,203
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $359Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $77
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $237AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback