QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	10.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '18 at 01:45
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core (Skylake, IBRS) 95 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 80.6 1-Core 130 2-Core 255 85% 155 Pts	4-Core 476 8-Core 508 65% 492 Pts	64-Core 511 32% 511 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 3978) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Lighting 68.1 Reflection 69.5 Parallax 60.2 56% 65.9 fps	MRender 67.9 Gravity 63.5 Splatting 58.2 51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 64GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 111 64 37 28 27 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.9% Very poor	Read 238 Write 110 Mixed 147 SusWrite 68.4 31% 141 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.3 15% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 85%
Qemu HARDDISK 320GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 208GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 66 66 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	7.37% Terrible	Read 71.2 Write 38.1 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 63.7 11% 51.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 2% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.37% Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer Slice 4GB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 3GB free, PID 5566 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.5 2.9 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	9.22% Terrible	Read 16.4 Write 3 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 3.3 8% 7.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2 138% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 9.22% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x12GB 4,175 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 12GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 24.2 76% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 18.8 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	139x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16