Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '18 at 01:30
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3 550-$68
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
42% Average
SC Int 73.4
SC Float 79.8
SC Mixed 71.7
60% 75 Pts
QC Int 187
QC Float 200
QC Mixed 196
44% 194 Pts
MC Int 187
MC Float 200
MC Mixed 195
29% 194 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 14.1
4% 13.1 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 14.2
5% 11.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 5%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$33
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 107 124 136 130 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 100
Write 121
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 123
68% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB-$30
198GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 83 84 79 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 76.8
Write 81.3
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 81.5
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
9GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 8.4 8 9.1 9.2 8.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 31
Write 5.8
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 8
16% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.1
206% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 12.8
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $280
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $359Nvidia GTX 1070 $340Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $235Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $97
Intel Core i5-8600K $237AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback