Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '18 at 01:15
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$250
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
70.6% Very good
SC Int 114
SC Float 122
SC Mixed 116
94% 118 Pts
QC Int 324
QC Float 338
QC Mixed 337
76% 333 Pts
MC Int 326
MC Float 335
MC Mixed 331
50% 331 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 2968) 2GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
45.5% Average
Lighting 153
Reflection 126
Parallax 152
47% 144 fps
MRender 85.1
Gravity 132
Splatting 89.4
44% 102 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 44%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 120GB-$50
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 62 61 77 73 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 92.8
Write 337
Mixed 336
SusWrite 72.1
48% 209 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 24.7
89% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 183
144% 204 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 93%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$42
772GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 177 171 175 187 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 163
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 178
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
29GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.7 7 7.5 9.3 8.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 21.8
Write 1
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 6.6
10% 9.77 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 11
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $1,108
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $340Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $77
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback