PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P6X58D-E (all builds) |
Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120806 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 14 '18 at 23:48 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5690
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
73%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1615 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
|
57.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 79 68 50 64 56 MB/s
|
38.9%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
17GB free
Firmware: CP100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 43 43 43 43 MB/s
|
23.4%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
19GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 58 54 49 54 51 MB/s
|
42.4%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 495x |
Core i7 930Intel $249Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 197x |
Core i7 960Intel $299Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 145x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 74x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 74x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 67x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $299 |