Asus P5GC-MX/CKD/SI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics7.31% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P5GC-MX/CKD/SI  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '18 at 20:44
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 92%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$48
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
SC Int 44
SC Float 19.3
SC Mixed 28.4
24% 30.6 Pts
QC Int 92.1
QC Float 59.8
QC Mixed 69
17% 73.6 Pts
MC Int 107
MC Float 66.5
MC Mixed 82.7
13% 85.4 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
XFX(1682 2600) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 15.7
5% 19 fps
MRender 18.7
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 15.9
9% 20.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 36 37 51 48 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 42.8
Write 33.2
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 41.4
25% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.4 3.7 4.2 4.7 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Read 8.9
Write 2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 4.3
7% 5.47 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.5
63% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 15%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
6GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.7 5.4 5.6 5.2 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 5.4
Mixed 5.4
SusWrite 5.4
8% 6.85 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.1
77% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 40%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P5GC-MX/CKD/SI Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus P5GC-MX/CKD/SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $150
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $340Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $77
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback