| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160520 |
| Uptime | 3.2 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 14 '18 at 20:41 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.6%
Excellent
|
78% 138 Pts
|
60% 451 Pts
|
27% 439 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.7%
Above average
|
53% 61.1 fps
|
52% 63.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
811GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 145 149 160 164 167 MB/s
|
84.3%
Excellent
|
95% 130 MB/s
|
122% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Expansion 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 36 35 35 36 MB/s
|
21.2%
Poor
|
25% 34.2 MB/s
|
218% 1.83 MB/s
| |
|
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 2GB
1GB free, PID 6025
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.5 MB/s
|
5.74%
Terrible
|
9% 8.52 MB/s
|
30% 2.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Group Inc. Team-Elite-2400 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
63.5%
Good
|
65% 22.9 GB/s
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
54% 73.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,911 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,112x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 638x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 554x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 838x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 468x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 366x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |