Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '18 at 20:34
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 71.3 1-Core 113 2-Core 225 75% 136 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 774 69% 584 Pts	64-Core 1,091 68% 1,091 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E213) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.5.1 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	8.95% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 13.6 Parallax 13.6 8% 12.4 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 9.07 Splatting 16.2 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.95% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 759 653 293 298 298 297 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	213% Outstanding	Read 2,190 Write 1,455 Mixed 1,211 SusWrite 433 293% 1,322 MB/s	4K Read 49.6 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 66.6 216% 73.7 MB/s	DQ Read 964 DQ Write 461 DQ Mixed 743 543% 723 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 213% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 95GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 301 356 360 358 314 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 467 Mixed 359 SusWrite 327 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 89.1 4K Mixed 56.2 180% 61.9 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 336 260% 356 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
Crucial M550 256GB-$152 8,333 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 140GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 260 269 258 257 261 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 442 Write 450 Mixed 310 SusWrite 258 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 80.1 4K Mixed 35.6 132% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 21.8 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 240 171% 206 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 113%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 653GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 114 110 113 117 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 108 Write 101 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 113 73% 99.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75 18,569 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 672GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 59 59 60 58 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 98.5 Write 101 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 58.3 57% 77.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169 37,519 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.1% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 18.7 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)