Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics90.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '18 at 18:27
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 218
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 674
64% 530 Pts
64-Core 840
52% 840 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.5% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 121
Parallax 114
96% 118 fps
MRender 86.5
Gravity 111
Splatting 92.6
79% 96.8 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 284 284 289 282 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 363
Write 351
Mixed 314
SusWrite 288
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 46.4
154% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 217
162% 218 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
109GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 107 109 109 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 142
Write 135
Mixed 65
SusWrite 109
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
14GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 19 22 23 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
30% Poor
Read 134
Write 25.3
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 22.2
57% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 3.1
175% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.1% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 23
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 20.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,046
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback