| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 14.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150626 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 14 '18 at 15:12 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
78.4%
Very good
|
70% 115 Pts
|
52% 424 Pts
|
30% 490 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1749 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
|
30.8%
Below average
|
29% 38.6 fps
|
34% 42 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X312
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 128 165 152 168 167 MB/s
|
86.8%
Excellent
|
71% 318 MB/s
|
151% 55 MB/s
|
169% 241 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
67GB free
Firmware: X312
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 189 196 211 160 177 MB/s
|
90.3%
Outstanding
|
80% 359 MB/s
|
155% 56.4 MB/s
|
169% 244 MB/s
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,817 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 865x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 645x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 438x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 186x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 160x |
| RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples | 118x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $358 |