User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardVS VS-G31T-M
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090526
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 14 '18 at 14:28
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium E5300-$25
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
22.4% Poor
SC Int 59.9
SC Float 37.2
SC Mixed 46.7
38% 47.9 Pts
QC Int 127
QC Float 72.5
QC Mixed 90.7
22% 96.9 Pts
MC Int 126
MC Float 73.6
MC Mixed 92.5
15% 97.4 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 23%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT
Device(196D 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 1.4
1% 4.07 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.1
2% 5.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 41 27 49 58 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 69.2
Write 68.4
Mixed 41.6
SusWrite 42.7
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
15.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $359Nvidia GTX 1070 $340Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $234Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $237AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback