PC ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPC ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG ZENITH EXTREME
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171221
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 23:34
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 63.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 247
77% 144 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 907
81% 683 Pts
64-Core 2,444
151% 2,444 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 240
XFX(1682 7240) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 6.81
Parallax 6.94
5% 6.45 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 6.91
5% 5.99 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 960GB-$397
818GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 434 445 458 460 462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 264
Mixed 345
SusWrite 447
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 30.7
114% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 158
162% 261 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
132% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 56.7
MC Mixed 51
151% 52.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 22
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback