Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 23:17
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5690
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 168
73% 120 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 571
52% 437 Pts
64-Core 691
43% 691 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1615 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 58.7
56% 64.4 fps
MRender 82.6
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 61.5
57% 71.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 36 28 27 35 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 317
Write 101
Mixed 224
SusWrite 42.4
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 21.9
82% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 27.6
DQ Mixed 43.1
50% 91.4 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 113%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
17GB free
Firmware: CP100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 39.9
Write 50.7
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 43.3
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
19GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 47 45 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 64.8
Mixed 43.1
SusWrite 47.5
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 58%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
58GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.1
Write 2.2
SusWrite 13.2
16% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
102% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
TOSHIBA MK6459GSX 640GB
11GB free, PID 70f1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 23 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 28.4
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 23.8
37% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $289
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback