HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 16:04
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 55%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 139
2-Core 274
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 887
88% 716 Pts
64-Core 975
60% 975 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
HP(103C 8439) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Lighting 75.1
Reflection 71.1
Parallax 65.2
61% 70.4 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 70.2
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 284 303 282 274 238 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 726
Write 426
Mixed 396
SusWrite 297
102% 461 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 55.8
168% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 593
DQ Write 599
DQ Mixed 223
270% 472 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 127%
Great: 193%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
688GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 176 172 175 179 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 168
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 175
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
898GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 89 88 89 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 112
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 88.8
73% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
317GB free
Firmware: 0711
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 168 169 170 170 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 170
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 169
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 103%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
13GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 14 14 14 13 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 137
Write 43.2
Mixed 37
SusWrite 12.9
60% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.6
138% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 23
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 27.1
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $366
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback