Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 05:23
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 145
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 490
46% 381 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Lighting 70
Reflection 60
Parallax 84.3
57% 71.4 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 76.2
54% 65.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 880 491 463 379 436 465 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
462GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 91 92 94 94 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 329
Write 320
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 92.8
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 4.6
16% 6.1 MB/s
DQ Read 8.6
DQ Write 9.5
DQ Mixed 7.9
6% 8.67 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 103%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 91 92 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 175
Write 164
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 93.2
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.6
309% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 111%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 190 189 190 191 183 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 115
Write 12.8
Mixed 90.9
SusWrite 188
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.5
300% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.8% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 16.5
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13.4
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback