MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B45
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '18 at 22:04
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 160
2-Core 319
105% 192 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 949
99% 793 Pts
64-Core 941
58% 941 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 108%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 121
Parallax 112
94% 116 fps
MRender 97.7
Gravity 102
Splatting 103
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2188 667 614 620 624 624 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,563
Write 2,383
Mixed 1,409
SusWrite 890
404% 1,811 MB/s
4K Read 68.8
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 91.4
312% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,873
DQ Write 1,266
DQ Mixed 1,501
1,139% 1,547 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 323%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 276 276 275 275 274 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 489
Mixed 404
SusWrite 297
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 62.3
222% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 236
212% 320 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 123%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 278 279 279 278 278 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 453
Mixed 402
SusWrite 300
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 61.9
222% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 229
208% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 124%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
112GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 132 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 400
Mixed 362
SusWrite 166
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 55.8
214% 78.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 170
180% 297 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 112%
Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.9 11 9.5 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 97
Write 21.5
Mixed 34
SusWrite 10.6
43% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
91% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 28%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 9.7 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 104
Write 11.2
Mixed 28
SusWrite 11.1
37% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.2
96% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 28%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 500GB
334GB free, PID 2101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 38
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 39.1
47% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 28.1
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 30.6
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 50.7
79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) Builds (Compare 3,944 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $964
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback