MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B45
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '18 at 20:29
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 683
72% 575 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 118
Parallax 101
94% 112 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 101
Splatting 102
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1856 907 618 617 620 607 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,536
Write 2,385
Mixed 1,402
SusWrite 871
401% 1,799 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 86.2
287% 98.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,582
DQ Write 1,072
DQ Mixed 1,265
961% 1,306 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 303%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 274 274 275 274 274 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 487
Mixed 343
SusWrite 295
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 57.3
203% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 214
201% 313 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 117%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 278 278 278 279 278 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 491
Mixed 320
SusWrite 299
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 56.9
203% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 215
202% 313 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 117%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
112GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 133 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 399
Mixed 336
SusWrite 166
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 52.1
198% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 169
179% 296 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.9 11 9.5 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 97
Write 21.5
Mixed 34
SusWrite 10.6
43% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
91% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 28%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 9 11 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 99
Write 11.3
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 11.3
34% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.2
95% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 28%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 500GB
334GB free, PID 2101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 35
Write 37
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 38.7
46% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 28.2
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 28.3
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) Builds (Compare 3,944 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $964
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback