Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20170331
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '18 at 22:39
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 101 2-Core 202 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 576 56% 459 Pts	64-Core 804 50% 804 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Lighting 68.5 Reflection 70.7 Parallax 62.9 56% 67.3 fps	MRender 63.4 Gravity 64.2 Splatting 57.7 50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 54%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 471 Write 283 Mixed 279 76% 344 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 46.4 168% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 319 244% 332 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 24GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 481 Write 460 Mixed 376 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 57 195% 69.1 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 265 224% 326 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 383 Write 229 Mixed 229 62% 280 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 43.4 164% 61.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 130 134% 223 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$130 1,513 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	MC Read 39.2 MC Write 40.5 MC Mixed 35.7 110% 38.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 20.3 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	758x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	194x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	113x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	86x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	39x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $371

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16