Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140319
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '18 at 20:07
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	69% Good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 177 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 520 54% 434 Pts	64-Core 663 41% 663 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54% Above average	Lighting 67.1 Reflection 68.3 Parallax 65.5 55% 67 fps	MRender 65.4 Gravity 62.1 Splatting 64.8 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 480 Write 452 Mixed 358 96% 430 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 44.4 144% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 308 233% 315 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1TB free Firmware: 82.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 94 95 114 113 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 114 Write 85.2 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 102 67% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 100%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 596GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 113 114 108 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 120 Write 121 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 110 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-16 4x8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	80.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.8 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 29.7 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 10.7 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 92.9 43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X79-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 - $380

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	432x
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	200x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	53x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	53x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	23x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	22x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 67%, 1,867 samples	35x
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 2,734 samples	28x
F3 DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 65%, 473 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $577

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16