TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell OptiPlex 9010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemDell OptiPlex 9010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9010  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '18 at 03:10
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 398
53% 399 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 77.2%
 Great: 75%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
EVGA(3842 6160)
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 70.2
Reflection 70
Parallax 60.7
57% 67 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 69.1
56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 56.8%
 Great: 56%
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.08% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 4.47
4% 4.6 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 3.93
Splatting 6.22
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 4.08%
 Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 322 253 125 45 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 487
Write 431
Mixed 381
SusWrite 184
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 31.3
109% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 144
164% 281 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 80%
 Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
49GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 231 231 233 223 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.6% Good
Read 254
Write 235
Mixed 232
SusWrite 221
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 35.9
119% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 194
146% 195 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 69.6%
 Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
187GB free
Firmware: 18.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 83 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 79.3
Write 76.6
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 83.5
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 46.8%
 Great: 69%
ZOOM H1 SD R&W 2GB
0GB free, PID 0120
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Read 4.8
Write 3
Mixed 3
SusWrite 3.3
4% 3.53 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
80% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 4.42%
 Great: 4%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 166 175 162 171 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 160
Write 79
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 158
132% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 59.8%
 Great: 73%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
395GB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 115 116 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 73.8
Write 95.7
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 114
119% 85 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.5
201% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 52.2%
 Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
423GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 20.2
Write 19.9
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 26.3
32% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.5
143% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 19.9%
 Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 14GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.4% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 59.4%
 Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OptiPlex 9010 Builds (Compare 3,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9010

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples1,834x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples769x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples672x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples468x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples359x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples359x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples159x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples82x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples56x
RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples95x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples88x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples71x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback