TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell OptiPlex 9010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemDell OptiPlex 9010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9010  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '18 at 03:01
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 400
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 76.5%
 Great: 75%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
EVGA(3842 6160)
CLim: 2214 MHz, MLim: 2163 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 0.27
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 61.2
0% 44 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 70.3
57% 69.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 19.4%
 Great: 56%
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.06% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 4.47
4% 4.58 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 3.93
Splatting 6.22
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 4.06%
 Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 296 194 158 148 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 468
Write 452
Mixed 366
SusWrite 230
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 31.6
110% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 144
163% 279 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 82.1%
 Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
49GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 235 231 238 226 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72% Very good
Read 249
Write 236
Mixed 232
SusWrite 229
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 40.1
125% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 193
146% 194 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 72%
 Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
187GB free
Firmware: 18.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 83 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 78.3
Write 74.9
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 82.9
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 46.3%
 Great: 69%
ZOOM H1 SD R&W 2GB
0GB free, PID 0120
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.5 3.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Read 4.7
Write 2
Mixed 3
SusWrite 3.3
4% 3.25 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.3
77% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 4.09%
 Great: 4%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 175 172 157 177 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
64% Good
Read 180
Write 78.2
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 165
138% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 64%
 Great: 73%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
395GB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 106 107 104 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 72.7
Write 95.8
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 106
116% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
198% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 49.8%
 Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
423GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 27 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 22.4
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 26.4
33% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.5
139% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 19.9%
 Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 14GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17.7
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 58.9%
 Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OptiPlex 9010 Builds (Compare 3,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9010

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples1,834x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples769x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples672x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples468x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples359x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples359x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples159x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples82x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples56x
RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples95x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples88x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples71x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback