Dell OptiPlex 9010

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

System	Dell OptiPlex 9010
Motherboard	Dell OptiPlex 9010 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180222
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '18 at 02:16
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 102 2-Core 179 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 398 53% 397 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 75%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6160) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 67.4 Reflection 70.7 Parallax 62.8 55% 67 fps	Gravity 57.4 Splatting 68.2 56% 62.8 fps
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8572) 2GB CLim: 836 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Lighting 4.23 Reflection 3.85 Parallax 3.94 4% 4.01 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 3.43 Splatting 5.43 4% 4.46 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 322 183 143 137 172 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 489 Write 461 Mixed 379 SusWrite 228 87% 389 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 31.5 107% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 146 165% 281 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 49GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 226 233 244 225 229 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69.4% Good	Read 254 Write 240 Mixed 236 SusWrite 230 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 35.8 116% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 195 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 187GB free Firmware: 18.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 83 84 83 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 75.5 Write 74.5 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 82.9 53% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 69%
ZOOM H1 SD R&W 2GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 0GB free, PID 0120 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.2 3.5 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	4.38% Terrible	Read 4.7 Write 2.7 Mixed 3 SusWrite 3.3 4% 3.42 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.3 80% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 4.38% Great: 4%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 890 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 3.5TB free, PID 331a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 173 173 177 164 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 146 Write 137 Mixed 29 SusWrite 165 157% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 73%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 970 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 395GB free, PID ab28 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 115 116 115 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 77.3 Write 95.8 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 116 121% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.5 201% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 423GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 28 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 20.3 Write 18.7 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 26.7 32% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.5 146% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 14GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.6% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 16.6 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 17.4 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OptiPlex 9010 Builds (Compare 3,882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9010

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,838x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	770x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	674x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	469x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	360x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	359x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	161x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	82x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	56x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	95x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	88x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	72x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16