Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics40% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '18 at 22:02
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 715
71% 579 Pts
64-Core 950
59% 950 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.8.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
40% Below average
Lighting 52.3
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 65.5
43% 50.8 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 43.1
35% 42.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 506
Write 493
Mixed 377
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 55.7
193% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 233
212% 323 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
128GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 294 295 294 293 294 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 477
Mixed 378
SusWrite 313
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 50.5
189% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 145
116% 165 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
431GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 148 148 147 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 156
Write 136
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 147
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
416GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 121 122 121 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 121
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback