| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F |
| Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140103 |
| Uptime | 1.4 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 10 '18 at 06:27 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
65.2%
Good
|
56% 91 Pts
|
42% 342 Pts
|
39% 637 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Asus(1043 849E) 3GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.4%
Above average
|
51% 69.9 fps
|
52% 65 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$26
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 364 368 371 366 369 MB/s
|
65.9%
Good
|
66% 290 MB/s
|
91% 36.3 MB/s
|
97% 162 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
501GB free
Firmware: 1A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 141 141 143 142 142 MB/s
|
86.7%
Excellent
|
104% 142 MB/s
|
242% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
92.5%
Outstanding
|
106% 37.3 GB/s
|
28% 9.67 GB/s
|
54% 74 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F Builds (Compare 31 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 7x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 5x |
| Xeon E5-2697 v2IntelBench 69%, 1,265 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon Pro WX 3100AMDBench 14%, 1,651 samples | 5x |
| Quadro FX 3800NvidiaBench 6%, 3,739 samples | 3x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 3x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples | 7x |
| 860 EVO 250G 250GBSamsungBench 86%, 3,453 samples | 5x |
| 520 Series 180GBIntel $140Bench 72%, 14,258 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $259 |