PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus Z10PE-D8 WS (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS |
Memory | 60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171212 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 09 '18 at 16:50 |
Run Duration | 243 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
66.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.31
|
88.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 385 390 390 390 390 MB/s
|
92.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Intel Raid 0 Volume 5.5TB
5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 329 330 322 328 328 MB/s
|
40.3%
Average
|
|||
Samsung 850 PRO 512GB
667GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 184 182 187 182 181 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
373GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 183 182 187 182 181 MB/s
|
96.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 PRO 256GB
827GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 184 182 187 182 181 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
39.4%
Below average
|
||||
Intel Raid 0 Volume 7.5TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 312 312 305 314 314 MB/s
|
156%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
64.2%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples | 20x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 20x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 16x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 36x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 22x |
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $643 |