Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '18 at 16:03
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 383
58% 418 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 37.3
37% 37.9 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 40
Splatting 35.3
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 101 99 92 92 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 452
Write 397
Mixed 278
SusWrite 122
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 37.2
148% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 166
179% 299 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
47GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 130 132 129 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 148
Write 126
Mixed 75
SusWrite 129
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 108%
Maxtor OneTouch 500GB
128GB free, PID 7310
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 4.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 28.7
23% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
50% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-432.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback