Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateSep 06 '18 at 19:34
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 116
54% 86.5 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 344
33% 273 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 20.4
19% 20 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 17
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 269 269 280 273 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 459
Write 293
Mixed 262
SusWrite 268
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 33.1
103% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 107
106% 173 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 128%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
926GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 124 119 125 123 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
70% Good
Read 121
Write 122
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 122
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70%
Great: 85%
General UDisk 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 23 22 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 18.7
Write 21.8
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 22.2
29% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 5.2
388% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 26%
Great: 40%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
2TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 88 89 89 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 82.5
Write 75.5
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 86.7
93% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.6% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 13.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10.2
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $334
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback