Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170915
Uptime5 Days
Run DateSep 06 '18 at 00:46
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 218
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 710
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 872
54% 872 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Zotac(19DA 1368) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 43% Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,106
Write 1,180
Mixed 532
278% 1,273 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 56.4
231% 90.6 MB/s
DQ Read 990
DQ Write 765
DQ Mixed 647
547% 801 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
26GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 513
Write 487
Mixed 391
103% 464 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 51.1
179% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 353
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
2.5TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 165 173 164 163 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 182
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 167
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
342% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 109%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
396GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 71 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 77.7
Write 72.7
Mixed 49
SusWrite 71.9
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 83%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
283GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 79.3
Write 75
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 79.6
55% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128
220GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 97 98 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 128
Write 127
Mixed 107
SusWrite 97.9
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 74%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
190GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 137 138 139 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 148
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 138
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 100%
WD 3200BEV External 320GB
47GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 38.2
Mixed 27
SusWrite 39.8
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x4GB-$97
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 35.8
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 20.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $864
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback