Asus K8V-MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus K8V-MX (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K8V-MX
Memory	0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20061213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 03 '16 at 10:36
Run Duration	1347 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron 3000+-$35 276 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket 754, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Memory 34.5 1-Core 8.1 2-Core 10 14% 17.5 Pts	4-Core 17.2 8-Core 6 2% 11.6 Pts	64-Core 18 1% 18 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3300831A 300GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 248GB free Firmware: 3.06 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 61 39 52386103 (03) Spinup time 99 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2448 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 248631313 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 6004 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2995 (C2) HDA temperature 34 54 51539607586 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 54 48 14336989 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 4 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	14.3% Very poor	Read 28.6 Write 21.4 Mixed 8.32 14% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.08 4K Write 0.28 4K Mixed 0.18 29% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 34%
WD WD800BB-88JHC0 80GB 2,880 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 77.07W77 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 96 87 1708 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 323 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11569 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 304 (C2) HDA temperature 109 253 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (C8) Write error rate 200 85 0	16% Very poor	Read 26.3 Write 29.2 Mixed 22.2 19% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.21 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.2 50% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 31%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB 880 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 8003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	0.64% Terrible	Read 0.95 Write 0.83 Mixed 0.88 1% 0.89 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.07 4K Mixed 0.03 5% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.64% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x1GB 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 1GB DIMM DDR Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	5.54% Terrible	MC Read 1.4 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.73 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 0.3 2% 0.7 GB/s	Latency 230 17% 230 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.54% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus K8V-MX

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)