PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell Precision T7610 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T7610 (all builds) |
Memory | 59 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140724 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Sep 05 '18 at 15:56 |
Run Duration | 238 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
|
52.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.58
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 146 159 148 146 153 MB/s
|
79.7%
Very good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
220GB free
Firmware: A7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 98 98 101 101 MB/s
|
58.6%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
72GB free
Firmware: A7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 163 166 165 165 165 MB/s
|
89.1%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 5TB
1TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 25 MB/s
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 107C 3TB
16GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 62 63 63 63 MB/s
|
28.6%
Poor
|
|||
WD Elements 107C 3TB
88GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 89 88 89 90 MB/s
|
42.6%
Average
|
|||
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
330GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 71 72 71 MB/s
|
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
66%
Good
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 64x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples | 64x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples | 40x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 56x |
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 41x |
Quadro K6000Nvidia $4,000Bench 44%, 1,173 samples | 24x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |