Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics64% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171227
Uptime7 Days
Run DateSep 05 '18 at 04:02
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 68.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 211
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 416
54% 410 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64% Good
Lighting 80.5
Reflection 80.5
Parallax 69.7
66% 76.9 fps
MRender 73.5
Gravity 73.1
Splatting 75.3
61% 74 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 216 223 224 210 211 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 432
Mixed 314
SusWrite 231
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 50.7
161% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 345
256% 339 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 124%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$47
202GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 136 137 135 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 166
Write 148
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 135
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
158GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 101 100 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 158
Write 151
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 101
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
104GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 88 88 87 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 98
Write 97
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 87.6
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 69%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 21 20 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 18.8
Write 20.2
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 20.4
27% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 4.2
275% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 24.4
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 19.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback