Dell Latitude E6400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Latitude E6400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0U695R
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130604
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateSep 04 '18 at 03:21
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P8800-$40
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 72
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 71.3
41% 60.2 Pts
4-Core 69.5
8-Core 72.5
10% 71 Pts
64-Core 68.7
4% 68.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 160M
Dell(1028 0233) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 327.2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.45% Terrible
Lighting 0.47
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.34
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.19
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.83
1% 0.71 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.45%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 181 184 194 189 200 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.5% Above average
Read 205
Write 79.7
Mixed 192
SusWrite 190
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 26.8
85% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 131
93% 118 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 123%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
13GB free, PID 007a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.1 6 6.2 6.3 5.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Read 19
Write 5.3
Mixed 7
SusWrite 6
10% 9.32 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 7%
Generic Mass-Storage 16GB
13GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 8.8 8.7 8.8 8.8 8.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
6.89% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 13
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 8.9
14% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.6
87% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.89%
Great: 16%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 17 17 16 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.2
Write 18.3
SusWrite 15.6
24% 20 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1
74% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6400 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $42
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback