Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9DRD-iF/LF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRD-iF
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '18 at 21:02
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 50.3
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 128
46% 81.7 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 382
40% 318 Pts
64-Core 927
57% 927 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2502ABYS-18B7A0 250GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.03B05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 104 106 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 76
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 102
61% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 64%
WD WD2502ABYS-18B7A0 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 02.03B05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 112 112 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 116
Write 110
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 112
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GX72Y133I HYN Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CF8 16GB
1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.1% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 3.8
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRD-iF/LF Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback