PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120814 |
Uptime | 19 Days |
Run Date | Sep 03 '18 at 12:30 |
Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 43% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
52.5%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 53 67 86 77 97 MB/s
|
51.8%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 198x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 150x |
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 139x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 149x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 90x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 72x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |