Acer Nitro AN515-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Freed_KLS
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170822
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '18 at 18:17
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 81
2-Core 162
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 322
43% 323 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 118A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 22.4
Parallax 6.62
6% 11.9 fps
MRender 6.19
Gravity 6
Splatting 14.1
8% 8.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI190000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 26 37 47 42 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 388
Write 67.2
Mixed 60
SusWrite 40.5
30% 139 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 7
30% 7.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 52%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
453GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 40 45 53 59 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 116
Write 96.8
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 52.2
61% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
188% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 79%
JMicron 500GB
166GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 86 99 100 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 72
Write 73
Mixed 46
SusWrite 96
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 67%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
11GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.4 6.4 7.1 6.8 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Read 22.3
Write 7.5
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 6.7
14% 12 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
48% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P21FC8T1-BSKS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 10.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-51 Builds (Compare 3,811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback