PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation T5400 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0RW203 |
Memory | 61.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120430 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 02 '18 at 13:54 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5460
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
49.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
81.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 241 245 248 248 248 MB/s
|
72.6%
Very good
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
160GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X54601stBench 48%, 616 samples | 21x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E54101stBench 43%, 392 samples | 18x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E54201stBench 44%, 603 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 12x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 36% - Below average | Total price: $172 |